No products in the cart.

How will Trump get his message out without social media?

Bookmark (0)
To login to your account click here.
HomeLatest Platform NewsApp StoresHow will Trump get his message out without social media?

The decision by tech oligarch’s to clamp down President Trump’s capacity to talk to followers through mainstream social media may require him to tap more conventional methods of communication, or choose more smaller audience stations during his final few days in office.

Twitter, Facebook, Google, Apple and Amazon.com have acted against Trump to limit his reach, fearing continued violence stemming from his posts after his supporters attacked the US Capitol building weekly. They were joined by smaller tech companies such as Twitch, Snapchat, Reddit, Shopify and TikTok.

Trump, who’s evidence challenged the validity of Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s Nov. 3 election success, praised and egged on supporters until they laid siege on Wednesday into the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying the Electoral College vote for Biden. Five individuals, including a Capitol Police officer, died in the attack.

Apple, Google and Amazon have suspended Parler – a pro-freedom of speech app from their various app stores and Web-hosting services, a set of moves which stand to seriously handicap the popular service.

The platform has 12 million users and Trump’s sons Donald Jr and Eric are active on it, but it will now have to find a new Web host to replace Amazon.


Immediately following the Twitter ban – a platform the president has been obsessed with since he first ran for office and where he regularly spoke to his 88 million followers – Trump vowed he would “not be SILENCED!” and promised a “big announcement soon.”

Related article:
UK's Zoom parliament makes an almost glitch-free debut

Trump also tweeted from the @POTUS Twitter account shortly after the ban and railed against the tech firm, Democrats along with a law protecting online companies called Section 230, and stated he was contemplating building his very own social networking platform. His tweets were nearly immediately deleted by the company.

But striking out on his own will probably take some time. For now, Trump, who leaves office on Jan. 20, is left with options like online conservative platform Gab, a free-speech system with practically no censorship rules, which has much less of a hit.

Aides and supporters are already turning to Gab and the stage MeWe to amplify his messages at the forthcoming days, experts said. Other probable outlets are video system Rumble and video streaming support DLive, along with alternate news sites like American Media Periscope, said Monica Stephens, assistant professor at the University of Buffalo, whose research concentrates on topics including social media.

“I don’t think Trump will join these smaller platforms himself. It is more likely he will create something on his own as opposed to joining something subjected to somebody else’s controls,” she said.

Related article:
President Trump claims Big Tech is dividing the country

In the meantime, he can tap Trump-friendly networks such as Fox News, OAN and Newsmax to receive out his message. The other underutilized option is the White House press office, specialists said. He could continue to hold briefings or disperse statements and videos until the conclusion of his term.


Immediately following the Twitter ban, backers such as Angela Stanton-King, a Republican supporter of the QAnon conspiracy team who conducted in November to represent Georgia’s 5th Congressional District, along with Republican Representative Thomas Massie began sharing their Parler reports on Twitter, encouraging followers to move there.

Others like conservative websites host Rush Limbaugh deactivated their Twitter accounts.

A number of Republican lawmakers denounced the social networking company decisions as an effort to stifle conservative voices and maintained that the moves would further polarize the country.

Some liberal free-speech activists were uneasy with all the motions too. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group, defended the right of Twitter and others to”curate their platforms,” but called for more transparency and transparency in decision making.

The American Civil Liberties Union said it “should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions.”

Related article:
Google's antitrust legal woes far from over if Biden wins


Silicon Valley businesses have regularly tried, often without much success, to take care of harmful content – from election disinformation to hate speech and violent dangers – but their actions in recent days are the toughest so far.

The First Amendment guaranteeing free speech does not normally apply to private-sector companies, permitting them to moderate speech that incites violence on their platforms.

But clearly, what he has done has exceeded any reasonable public policy interest,” explained Chris Krebs, former manager of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

The team at Platform Executive hope you have enjoyed the ‘[post_title]’ article. Translation from English to other languages via Google Cloud Translation. Initial reporting via our official content partners at Thomson Reuters. Reporting by Nandita Bose and David Shepardson in Washington. Editing by Chris Sanders and Peter Cooney. Comment by Rob Phillips.

Stay on top of the latest developments across the platform economy and gain access to our problem-solving tools, proprietary databases and content sets by becoming a member of our community. For a limited time, premium subscription plans start from just $16 per month.