Google at odds with US over protective order for firms tied to lawsuit

Google

Google along with the US Justice Department have failed to reach agreement on a protective arrangement for third parties such as Microsoft that supplied information to the authorities because of its litigation against the search and advertising giant.

Google is pressing for two in-house lawyers to gain access to this private information while the Justice Department and state attorneys general involved in the litigation have surfaced, Google stated in a court filing Friday.

Google said it had the data to prepare an effective defence. It offered to make sure that any confidential information could be made available solely to two in-house lawyers in the offices of Google’s external counsel or at another protected fashion, including that it could immediately report any refusal.

The authorities said in another filing that permitting Google’s staff lawyers to review “strategic plans related to rival voice assistants, and other commercially sensitive information” was harmful since they might misuse the data to squash possible competitors.

Related Article:
Showdown looms between Silicon Valley and US states over contact tracing

The authorities also stated that highly confidential documents in the past huge technology antitrust case, which included Microsoft Corp roughly 20 years back, were only accessible to the organization’s outside counsel.

The firms whose records have been in dispute at the Google case additionally comprise Oracle, AT&T Inc, Amazon.com, Comcast Corp and many others. They have until next Friday to create their suggestions for the conditions of a protective order.

The authorities sued Google in October, declared the $1 billion business of illegally using its market muscle to hobble competitions from the largest challenge to the energy and sway of Big Tech in decades.

The team at Platform Executive hope you have enjoyed this news article. Initial reporting via our official content partners at Thomson Reuters. Reporting by Diane Bartz. Additional reporting by Paresh Dave in San Francisco. Editing by Leslie Adler.

Related Article:
Instagram bans influencers from promoting vaping products

Stay on top of the latest developments across the platform economy and gain access to our problem-solving tools, proprietary databases and content sets by becoming a premium member. Subscription plans start at under $7 per month.

Share This Post